|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Secret Government (continued)
Probably a special sub-set of the National
Security Council, involving the NSA and the CIA and NRO.
Intelligence security stuff works like an old Western wagon
wheel without a rim; you've got a lot of spokes going in, but
spokes don't touch each other. And only what's in the middle -
or who's in the middle - sees the whole picture. In other
words, intelligence doesn't work by everybody exchanging with
everybody else what they've got, quite the reverse. So I
suspect MJ-12 - undoubtedly under a different name now - is a
connection. You notice in the original group that the first
three Directors of Central Intelligence were part of it. And
when [Secretary of Defense, James] Forrestal departed he was
replaced by a fourth Director of Central Intelligence. So
clearly we have guys like that involved, I mean that's not an
accident in other words. [16]
The make-up of MJ-12 was extraordinary and
the scope and depth of knowledge that its participants could
bring to bear was enormous. This alone points to the extreme
importance with which the US Government held the UFO problem
after the Roswell crashes. As more official documentation
emerges the credibility of the Eisenhower Briefing document
rises. Although initially skeptical about the authenticity of
the papers, Friedman's research through the National Archives
convinced him otherwise:
He remembers: [Researcher Bill Moore and
Jaime Shandera] went in early July 1985 [to the National
Archives], and found the Cutler-Twining memo, and they called
me about that from Washington, and it immediately reminded me
of another memo we had, something about “your concurrence
in the above change of arrangements is assumed,”
something like that. And we had been at the archives, looking
at the Twining papers in the early 80's, and found memos . .
.on operation Majestic-12, and that rang a bell, and we started
checking around a bit more. One of the important things is that
we found all sorts of stuff to be true that we didn't know to
be true when we got the documents . . . For example, it came to
light that Robert Cutler [Eisenhower's Special Assistant for
National Security] was out of the country on the date of the
Cutler-Twining memo and some people say, well, that proves it's
phoney. Well there's no signature on it. I talked to the guy
who worked for Truman, and Roosevelt before that, it would be
perfectly normal for Edward Lay, who was the executive
secretary for the National Security Council to do that in
Cutler's place. And then when I was at the Eisenhower Library I
ran across, in a box of NSC documents, one of the zillion they
have, a document that was on a withdrawal sheet but it was from
Cutler too, I mean from later Cutler and right in the time
frame, and so I asked for that, and it took a couple of years
to get it, but yeah, gee, Lay was communicating with Cutler.
He'd left behind a memo saying keep things moving out of my
in-basket, and here's Lay telling him he's doing that. I mean,
they all fit together, we didn't have any of that information
when we started out.
I see so much crap out there relating to
MJ-12 I sometimes think it's hilarious, sometimes it's as
frustrating as heck but people make up this stuff about MJ-12.
Look how the Truman signature is supposedly a duplicate. We
have these noisy negativists saying, oh, [Albert S.] Osborn
'Questioned Documents', 1978, says you can't have identical
signatures, and so forth. In the first place, the book was
written in 1910! Not in '78. Second place, it says, just a
paragraph away from something they quote from the book, that
you can have essentially identical signatures except not
consecutively. And the legal case which dates back to around
the turn of the century, some 80-year old guy whose will, four
pages of it, had four identical signatures. And they say,
“Uh huh, Osborn says it can't be.” That doesn't
mean that Harry Truman never signed his name exactly the same.
He bragged, I think it was to his sister, that after his
victory in '48, totally unexpected by a lot of people, he was
signing thank you notes for all the people who worked on the
campaign, and it got to the point where he could sign 500 an
hour, and you're gonna tell me that none of these were
identical to any other one? Come on! Where's this coming from?
So I see so much false information put
forwards as if it was the truth. [Author] Kevin Randle claimed
that [Rear-] Admiral [Roscoe H.] Hillenkoetter would never have
signed his name 'Admiral Hillenkoetter'. There's no
Hillenkoetter signature on the MJ-12 documents! It's on a list
of people using generic ranks, which is perfectly normal when
you have a mixed group, that is, half-civilian, half-military.
What difference is there if you're a four star general or a two
star general? If you're a civilian you don't have a rank. In
Eisenhower's books you'll find he uses generic ranks, General
So-and-So, [rather than specifically a] four star general or
only a two star. There's a ton of this stuff out there. [16]
Thanks to Friedman's exhaustive research,
the MJ-12 documents appear to hold up under scrutiny. What this
means is that a secret Government agency, headed by some of the
most learned and powerful people in the country, was
established in order to deal with a set of extraordinary
circumstances. However, while, as noted above, the intelligence
services have managed to elude all but a passing measure of
oversight by Congress, MJ-12 has escaped it entirely. Friedman
is sanguine about this lack of supervision given the nature of
the subject matter. He comments: “I don't want technical
data [from Roswell or elsewhere] put out on the table for the
Saddam Husseins of the world.”
Nonetheless, the one group of people who
would stand to benefit from the technology gleaned from the
Roswell crashes were those at the centre of Friedman's wagon
wheel, and, to a lesser degree, the whole of American society.
Aftermath: Technology
Lieutenant Colonel Philip J. Corso headed
the Foreign Technology desk at the Army Research and
Development post in the Pentagon from 1961 to 1963 [17]. During
this period the Pentagon's expenditure rose from
$76,539,412,799 in fiscal year 1960 to a staggering
$97,684,374,795 in fiscal year 1964, an increase of over 27 per
cent [18].
Given that the United States was not
actually at war throughout this time - the Korean War having
effectively ended and the Vietnam War yet to start - what can
explain this phenomenal growth rate?
One possible explanation is the work that
Corso was carrying out from his desk at the Pentagon. As he
relates in his book, written shortly before his death: There
was a lot of talk and pressure from the Joint Chiefs of Staff
about technology sharing and joint weapons development, but my
boss [Lt. General Arthur G. Trudeau] wanted us to keep what we
had to ourselves, especially what he jokingly kept calling
“the alien harvest”. [19]
This 'alien harvest' was what had been
recovered from the Roswell crashes. It became Corso's duty to
seed this technology out to trustworthy companies - i.e. those
used to working on Top Secret 'black' projects - to discover
whether any of the material had practical applications. They
struck gold.
Amongst the most notable, and useful,
technologies recovered from the craft were what Corso describes
as 'silicon wafers'. He comments:
I didn't realize it at first when I showed
these silicon wafers to General Trudeau, but I was about to
become very quickly and intimately involved with the burgeoning
computer industry and a very small, completely invisible, cog
in an assembly-line process that fifteen years later would
result in the first microcomputer systems and the personal
computer revolution. [20]
The inspiration for that revolution in
micro circuitry, as he writes, “had fallen out of the sky
at Roswell and set the development of digital computers off in
an entirely new direction” [21]. Corso seeded the
technology to three companies, Sperry-Rand, Hughes and Bell
Laboratories, and the results have changed the world.
Other technology that was back-engineered
from the crash-sites included lasers [22] and fibre optics
[23]. Dr. Gerard Bull, the Canadian scientist who would later
achieve notoriety, if not infamy, for his work on the proposed
Iraqi 'Super-gun', began this effort based on data gleaned from
the Roswell crashes and the potential for high altitude,
long-distance weaponry [24]. According to Corso, other military
developments have included Stealth technology, depleted uranium
shells and, perhaps most frightening of all, attempts to
produce the 'death-ray' first conceived by Serbian physicist
Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) [25].
In short, the technology recovered
from the Roswell crashes radically changed the world. More
importantly, it ensured that the United States became the most
powerful nation on Earth. The US had already assumed this
position at the close of the Second World War but the
technological treasures that befell them courtesy of the
Roswell crashes meant that they managed to retain this position
far longer than might otherwise have been expected.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|