|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Secret Government (continued)
Eventually, in 1997, the United States Air
Force issued their final word on the subject with the
publication of a book by Captain James McAndrew called 'The
Roswell Report: Case Closed'. By now the Air Force had changed
their story yet again. The discrepancies in the report as
outlined by Friedman and Berliner were now explained as follows:
The debris. The debris reported by Brazel
and recovered by officers from the 509th “was not the
remnants of an extraterrestrial spacecraft and its alien crew,
but debris from an Army Air Forces balloon-borne research
project code named Mogul.” [1]
The bodies. The reports of
extraterrestrial bodies being taken to Roswell Army Air Force
base for autopsy were in fact nothing more than high altitude
crash-test dummies. [2]
The witnesses. The witnesses were all,
apparently, mistaken, lying or attention-seeking. [3]
While McAndrew's 230-page report is
ostensibly impressive, much like the Warren Commission report
into the Kennedy assassination, on closer examination it fails
to hold water.
While Project Mogul may, at the time, have
been a classified operation the use of weather balloons was
not. Brazel was no newcomer to the New Mexico outback and would
undoubtedly have come across weather balloons that had fallen
from the sky often enough. He would not have reported this to
the sheriff, still less taken a 140-mile round trip to do so.
But even if Brazel had been so deceived, is it really credible
that a career military officer like Major Marcel or a
Counter-Intelligence officer like Cavitt could have been taken
in by a crashed weather balloon? While the project to detect
Soviet nuclear testing - which did not begin for another two
years - might have been classified, the material they were
using for this operation was not. According to McAndrew, the
USAAF had been using polyethylene high-altitude balloons rather
than standard rubber ones for research purposes. This caused
some 'misunderstandings'. [4]
Further misunderstandings were brought
about by unsuspecting observers spotting these balloons from
the ground. McAndrew states: “During this period,
polyethylene balloons launched from Holloman AFB [New Mexico]
generated flying saucer reports on nearly every flight.”
Further: “The large balloons generated UFO reports based
on their radar tracks. This was due to their large metallic
payloads that weighed up to several tons and echoed radar
returns not usually associated with balloons.” [5]
As conclusive proof that what was
recovered on the Foster ranch was nothing more than a
radar-reflecting weather balloon, McAndrew offers the now
famous photograph of Major Marcel displaying wreckage in the
office of General Roger Ramey at Wright-Patterson Air Force
Base. He writes: Maj. Jesse Marcel, an intelligence officer
from Roswell Army Air Field, with the debris found 75 miles
northwest of Roswell in June 1947. When compared to the
standard radar target used by project MOGUL, it is clear they
are the same object. [6]
This is grossly misleading. No one has
ever argued that what Marcel was photographed with at that
point was the debris from a weather balloon. However, this is
not what he and Cavitt recovered from the ranch. That debris
was not presented to the waiting press. That debris, as we
shall see, was kept hidden from the public and remains so to
this day. Further, it bears no relation to that described by
Marcel and his son, Dr. Jesse Marcel, who handled the material.
This was light, flexible but extremely strong, almost
indestructible. Nothing on Earth, even 50 years on, matches
this account.
As far as the actual eye witnesses to the
events at Roswell AAF base and the reports of alien bodies,
McAndrew casts doubt on the evidence of Glenn Dennis, who
worked as an assistant at the mortuary home used by the base
and was therefore known well by the workers at the base
hospital, where the alien bodies were taken once they had been
recovered from the crash site. Dennis had taken an injured
airman there that night.
He knew one of the nurses who, on that
night, was in a distressed state. He describes the scene as
follows: What happened, she told me the next day, they were all
sick because those little bodies were in those sacks, and two
of them were very mangled and the smell was horrible and one
was whole and two were very badly mangled. [7]
Dennis recalled being ordered from the
building and his life threatened if he should talk about it
[8]. Shortly after, the nurse was transferred to Europe and
Dennis lost touch with her, his correspondence being returned
with the information “[addressee] deceased” [9].
The only problem with this account is
Dennis's refusal to name the nurse. She swore him to secrecy
and he has refused to break that commitment, despite her
apparent demise.
McAndrew identifies her as 1st Lieutenant
Eileen M. Fanton, who was indeed transferred to Europe soon
after the event but retired from active duty due to a medical
condition in 1955 [10].
The author also queries Dennis's
recollection of a Captain 'Slatts' Wilson, the head nurse. He
cites two possible identities for this woman, neither of whom
were stationed at Roswell AAF base at the time [11]. He also
questions Dennis's assertion that there was a white officer and
a black NCO working together since the armed forces at this
stage were segregated [12].
On the other hand, Dennis does not suggest
they were working in the same unit, merely that one, the
sergeant, obeyed the orders of the other, the officer.
McAndrew's explanation for the 'bodies' is
simple: they were the newly utilised anthropomorphic crash-test
dummies used to test falls from high altitudes. Nonetheless, as
the author himself notes, these particular dummies were not
manufactured until 1949, by the Sierra Engineering Company of
Sierra Madre, California, and were not delivered until the
following year [13]. Therefore, in 1947, the time at which
McAndrew alleges they were mistaken for alien bodies, these
anthropomorphic dummies were not available.
But even if they had been, or even
supposing they were early prototype models in use at the time,
how a “skeleton of aluminum or steel, latex or plastic
skin, a cast aluminum skull, and an instrument cavity in the
torso and head for the mounting of strain gauges,
accelerometers, transducers and rate gyros” which stood
at “72 inches tall, weighed 200 pounds . . . and could
withstand up to 100 times the force of gravity” [13],
could be mistaken for an alien body remains unexplained.
Similarly, where did the smell that so sickened the nurse and
others present come from? And if these were crash test
dummies, why were they taken to the hospital?
Despite these anomalies in McAndrew's
explanation of these events, he concludes that: “Dummies
of these types were most likely the 'aliens' associated with
the 'Roswell Incident'.”[13] He bases this purely on the
fact that some descriptions of the recovered bodies bear some
resemblance to that of these dummies [14], and reproduces
photographs of the same to illustrate his point [15].
In his summary of the incident,
McAndrew dismisses any claims that one or two extraterrestrial
craft crashed near Roswell AAF base. He writes:. . . It is
reasonable to conclude, with a high degree of certainty, that
the two “crashes” were actually descriptions of a
launch or recovery of a high altitude balloon and
anthropomorphic dummies . . . The extensive detailed
descriptions provided by the witnesses, too numerous to be
coincidental, were of the equipment, vehicles, procedures, and
personnel of the Air Force research organizations who conducted
the scientific experiments HIGH DIVE and EXCELSIOR [both USAF
high altitude tests]. [16]
For McAndrew this explanation may suffice
but it has singularly failed to quieten the calls for the Air
Force and other Government agencies to reveal what they know
about the reality of the Roswell Incident. Experienced officers
do not mistake crashed weather balloon debris for
extraterrestrial craft. Military personnel are not required to
scour fields in order to recover said weather balloon debris
for flight to Wright-Patterson Air Base in Ohio under armed
guard. Nor are Air Force Generals in the habit of issuing press
releases acknowledging recovery of a crashed UFO when what they
are in fact sitting on is a downed radar-reflector.
McAndrew fails to address any of this
because either he has no answers or he has not been asking the
right questions.
The press release issued by Lt. Haut made
the front page of the Roswell Daily Record the following day,
Tuesday July 8, 1947. Aside from the admission that Marcel had
recovered a 'flying saucer' the article says nothing
particularly of note. However, a more revealing text appears at
the bottom of the page. Under the headline 'Air Force General
Says Army Not Doing Experiments', General Nathan F. Twining,
the head of Air Materiel Command, is quoted as saying:
“Neither the AAF nor any other component of the armed
forces had any plane, guided missile or other aerial device
under development which could possibly be mistaken for a saucer
or formation of flying discs .
. . Some of these witnesses evidently saw
something but we don't know what we are investigating.”
[17]
Twining is a key figure and would
certainly be aware of any development, however classified, that
might be misidentified as a flying saucer but here he admits
not only his ignorance but concedes that something must have
been spotted. How different from McAndrew's bluster about
weather balloons.
The upshot of the Roswell crashes would be
far-reaching and deeply significant, both in terms of National
Security and technological advancement in the United States.
The event would also have repercussions
for the rest of the world. Next we will look at some of these
as the Government struggled to come to terms with the magnitude
of the incident.
Notes: Chapter One
[1] Captain James McAndrew 'The Roswell
Report: Case Closed' (Barnes & Noble, 1997 p.1)
[2] McAndrew p.18ff
[3] McAndrew p.55ff
[4] McAndrew p.40
[5] McAndrew p.41
[6] McAndrew p.7
[7] McAndrew p.203
[8] McAndrew p.204
[9] McAndrew p.209
[10] McAndrew p.82/3
[11] McAndrew p.91
[12] McAndrew p.86
[13] McAndrew p.21
[14] McAndrew pp.69-71
[15] McAndrew p.59
[16] McAndrew p.67
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|